Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1608

reference
453-tree-1
name
1608
tree-preservation-order

undefined

453-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.044720 50.883830)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.044536 50.883811,-1.044544 50.883847,-1.044570 50.883880,-1.044610 50.883906,-1.044661 50.883923,-1.044718 50.883929,-1.044776 50.883924,-1.044827 50.883908,-1.044869 50.883882,-1.044896 50.883850,-1.044906 50.883814,-1.044897 50.883778,-1.044872 50.883745,-1.044831 50.883719,-1.044780 50.883702,-1.044723 50.883695,-1.044666 50.883701,-1.044614 50.883717,-1.044573 50.883742,-1.044546 50.883775,-1.044536 50.883811)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL